AMC Releases Lackluster “The Walking Dead” Sneak Peak

The Walking Dead Season 3

Image: TheWalkingDeadMegaVideo.com

As you may have gathered, I’ve got mixed feelings about AMC’s The Walking Dead. All of the great things about the show can be summed up in two words: “Season 1.”

Similarly, all of the terrible things about the show can be summed up in two words: “Season 2.”

Sure, sure, I’m exaggerating just a tad. Season 2 wasn’t all bad, especially for those of us who love to watch television shows about love triangles and baby-daddy drama. The only problem with that is that there are a whole bunch of shows like that already, and there is only one show on TV that suggests zombies in the title. Is it really too much to ask to keep our one and only zombie show sacred and make it focused on, oh, I don’t know… zombies?!

Well, after a disappointing second season, AMC has released a sneak peak of the next episode, Nebraska, set to debut on February 12. I know you’re all a-titter in anticipation, so I won’t make you scroll through any more of my commentary before getting to the good stuff:

Two mystery men have just appeared on the scene, revealing nothing about themselves except that they’re surprised to see people alive, and that they’re probably from Nebraska (I’m basing that assumption entirely on the title). As tantalizing as these new characters and the mysteries that they bring to the show might be, do any of us actually care?

I can’t help but notice that there is one thing rather conspicuously absent in the clip. Can you guess what it is? It starts with a “z,” has a cult following of nerds, and is one of the sole reasons for turning on the telly. No, it’s not Zooey Deschanel.

Zooey Deschanel Zombie

Image: Zooey Deschanel Tumblr

Zombies! Where are my zombies, AMC? How are you supposed to make any of us care about these new characters when there isn’t a very serious and constant threat of zombies? Are these strangers rough-and-tumble ruffians here to stir up some trouble?

Pfft, whatever. Without any zombies around, the group can just pick up and drive to any of the supposedly dozens of perfectly safe scenic farmhouses in the area. I pray that “Nebraska” is the name of a character or a boat or something, and not where these two new mystery men are from. If they really did make it all the way from Nebraska to Georgia shortly after a zombie apocalypse, then that means that America really isn’t all that dangerous. At all.

The Walking Dead Poster

Image: Babbleon5

Well, the first step after surviving an apocalypse of any type is to begin rebuilding and repopulating the world. Maybe that’s why the writers have been focusing on all of this frou-frou love drama.

Beauty and the Beast Odd Couples. Will 2012 be different?

For the last couple of years now I’ve seen an interesting trend on television.  Competent, intelligent and attractive women in sitcoms married to or dating overweight, whiny, or incompetent husbands or boyfriends. I know this sounds kind of harsh, but I also know that you will NEVER see it the other way around portrayed on television and it’s slightly annoying to me. Women have a reputation, as a whole, for seeking qualities in a man that are more concerned with personality and character over looks, while as a whole, men seem to value looks as being “up there” along with the rest of what they seek. However, I’ve noticed on television a theme for a couple of years now that I find rather perplexing. Not only have there been multiple sitcoms portraying a slender, gorgeous, career driven, supportive woman married to or dating…a doofus frankly, but often times that doofus is also not all exactly overflowing in other characteristics.  Do these portrayals have an effect on modern men’s expectations in dating and love? Let’s take a look at a couple of popular sitcoms that reflect this unrealistic portrayal:

Elizabeth Banks on Scrubs

image: extratv.warnerbrothers.com

Continue reading